Chef Duff Goldman tells same-sex couple he'll bake cake for free

Duff Goldman, the executive chef of Ace of Cakes, has a message for the same-sex couple denied a wedding cake from a Gresham bakery: He’ll make it for free.
“I saw this story and I thought, ‘Hey, I can do something,’” Goldman said in a video interview Monday with the Huffington Post. “I will make the cake for free, drive it up to Portland just to right this wrong.”
The famous pastry chef’s response came after the story of a Gresham bakery owner refusing to make the cake for couple made national news. The story, first reported by KATU, was picked up by the Huffington Post and is currently the most popular article on its website, based on 5,000 shares.
Goldman, whose bakery is based out of Baltimore, said he prepares a lot of wedding cakes for same-sex couples and was surprised by the local baker’s actions. He described the baker’s response as “blatant.”
Aaron Klein, the owner of Sweet Cakes, told KATU on air that he told the woman last month that he couldn’t make her wedding cake because of his religious beliefs.
The woman told KATU that he called her and her partner “abominations to the Lord;" Klein denied making that statement.
The Oregon Attorney General's Office is investigating whether Klein violated the state's Equality Act in denying service.
The question for Christians is "Would  Jesus have baked a cake for the couple?
That Gresham bakery owner who refused is also a racist. Check out their facebook page rant on N-words and other lovely hate filled ranting.
Â
http://imgur.com/5Sb69Yk
 @RelaxThereIsNoGod Don't buy it. That Facebook page you posted is fraudulent and was never posted by Sweet Cakes or any one associated with the bakery. It is pretty simple to make up fake slanderous facebook pages. Where have you been?
This comment has been deleted
 @XoztedMama  @RelaxThereIsNoGod You need to be able to prove that Melissa at Sweet Cake posted this filth. Anyone could have done that and attributed it to them. You cannot believe everything on the Internet.
 @catzmeow You are right. There are reasonable explanations on how these images could have been somebody or something else. They are not proof (unless I saw it with my own eyes and then snapped the screen shot - then I could attest to the proof of the photo). To anybody who was offended: I apologize for posting the link to the inflammatory photos. I have deleted both comments which might be considered insensitive.
Â
That being said, I still strongly disagree with this bakery's (owner's) stance. For one thing, do they screen everybody and hold pre-marriage counseling to make sure that all of the cakes they bake are going to couples whom they approve of and think that the marriage will last? Or did they single this couple out based on one characteristic that they didn't like?
Â
Another point, they were hired to provide a service. Their service (or lack thereof) had no effect on the marriage itself. If they were being asked to officiate the ceremony, or otherwise participate in the ceremony, I could see where their individual beliefs could reasonable prevent them from doing that duty. They, however, were only asked to provide a service. Not unlike the people who sell the flowers, provide the service or chairs or any other numerous items that might be at the wedding. Bottom line, after they make the cake and sell it, they have no right to say how it might or might not be used. They are not doctors handing out medication that could prove fatal. If somebody wanted to buy a cake from them and use it in a pagan ceremony where they dance naked under the moon and eat cake, then it doesn't reflect on the baker's beliefs (just his ability to make a cake that others enjoy).
Â
Finally, I STRONGLY object to "Christians" (in quotes because when I was raised a Christian and I was taught to love others) trying to claim marriage as something of their own. From everything that I've been able to read, the institution of marriage predates Christ... by quite a bit. Marriages have, and are, celebrated in many different cultures. Sometimes the marriages are sacred to a particular deity, other times they are not. There is NOT a single religion out there who can claim ownership of the idea, word, or institution of marriage. It does not belong solely to Christianity, nor to any other religion. Just because a particular belief system doesn't recognize the validity of the commitment, doesn't mean the commitment is invalid. Just as a decent human wouldn't go up to a Jew or an Indian (or anybody else) and tell them that the marriage they had, that was unique to their cultural and spiritual beliefs wasn't valid; it is just as wrong to try and tell any two individuals that their marriage isn't valid because it doesn't match your ideology.
Good for him! While it's true, any business does "reserve the right to refuse service to anyone", I think the Gresham Bakery owner was wrong for doing this. As a business owner, I may not like YOU, your personality, your looks, your beliefs or any number of other things about you. However... unless you are being abusive, or demanding something that from a business standpoint I cannot afford to do, I feel I should serve you regardless of my "personal" feelings about you. Businesses serve the public and you are walking a thin-line when you start denying service (discriminating)based on status such as "sexual orienation". Regardless of personal beliefs, I think sexual orientation rightfully falls into the same "protected status category" as gender, race, religioun, ethncity, etc.
 @eugene123 Once you get a business license from the state you are not allowed to refuse service based on sexual orientation.
Capitulation achieved.
Good. Â For a moment I was afraid the Gresham baker had lost his ethics. Â