Obama's Inauguration Day is a day for MLK Jr., too

WASHINGTON (AP) - Monday's inaugural may be President Barack Obama's big day, but Martin Luther King Jr. will loom large over the festivities.
A quirk in the calendar pushed Obama's public swearing-in onto the national holiday honoring the slain civil rights leader, and inaugural planners have taken pains to acknowledge that fact. Going into his second term, Obama seems to have put King at the front of his mind, too.
The president has referenced King in speeches, and a weekend of inaugural festivities opened Saturday with a National Day of Service in King's honor. Obama and his family helped spruce up an elementary school in southeast Washington. The Obamas also have performed community service work on the King holiday in each of the past four years.
Obama spoke at the 2011 dedication of a memorial to King on the National Mall and is likely to include King in his inaugural address on Monday.
The president has said King is one of two people he admires "more than anybody in American history." President Abraham Lincoln is the other. In a nod to that admiration, Obama will take his ceremonial oath of office Monday using Bibles owned by both men. Lincoln's Bible, which Obama also used in 2009, will rest on top of King's, which is larger.
"The movements they represent are the only reason that it's possible for me to be inaugurated," Obama said in a video released by inaugural planners.
Obama is perhaps the most high-profile result of King's quest for civil rights and racial equality in the U.S. He credits King for his own political victories, particularly the 2008 election win that lifted him over the highest hurdle for minorities in American politics.
Even with that, there are distinctions in their styles. While King was a staunch advocate for the poor and downtrodden, Obama has been faulted by critics who say he's been reluctant to push issues of concern to black people and take steps to reduce high rates of black unemployment. Where King opposed wars in general and was an unwavering advocate of nonviolence, Obama has shown himself to be willing to target and kill leaders of terrorist groups overseas.
Fredrick Harris, director of Columbia University's Center on African-American Politics and Society, argues that Obama's reluctance to bring black issues to the forefront undermines the work of King and other civil rights leaders whose efforts made his presidency possible.
"Dr. King died in 1968 fighting for low-wage garbage workers in Memphis, Tenn. He was starting a national poor people's movement to address the issues of poverty," Harris said. "With the president, a Democratic president for that matter, who has spoken less on race or the poor or poverty than any Democratic president in a generation, it is problematic when we think of that aspect of King's legacy."
On at least one foreign policy issue, the Middle East, Obama and King seem to be in accord. Lewis V. Baldwin, a religious studies professor at Vanderbilt University, writes in a new book that Obama's approach to Israeli security and empowering the Palestinians dovetails with King's thoughts on the matter.
On the jacket of Baldwin's book, "In a Single Garment of Destiny," Obama explained his take on King's idealism.
"When met with hardship, when confronting disappointment, Dr. King refused to accept what he called the 'isness' of today. He kept pushing for the 'oughtness' of tomorrow," Obama wrote.
Obama recognizes his role in U.S., and even world, history and how he has benefited from the work of King and other civil rights advocates. During his presidency, he has paid regular tribute to King, who was assassinated in April 1968 in Memphis, Tenn., when Obama was just 6 years old. America's first black president will deliver his second inaugural address looking out across the National Mall toward the Lincoln Memorial, where King delivered his "I Have a Dream" speech nearly 50 years ago.
One of eight floats scheduled to participate in the parade down Pennsylvania Avenue between the Capitol and the White House on Monday will honor King, featuring his image and a representation of his quote "out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope."
A wreath-laying ceremony was held Sunday at the King Memorial, though it was scheduled during Obama's swearing-in at the White House and the president did not attend.
Sandra Young, of Silver Spring, Md., said she was moved by the overlap between the two events.
"As an African-American, we think of the fact that we can do anything we set our minds to," said Young, who said she was in her 60s. "Being here, also, we think of the dream, and the dream is alive, and it's a real thing."
Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a veteran of the civil rights movement who knew King and knows Obama, said the symbolism was overwhelming.
"It is almost too much to believe that we would commemorate this year, the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington," Lewis said. "I don't know what you'd call it, something about time and history and fate all coming together."
Lincoln issued the proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, during the Civil War, declaring all slaves in states rebelling against the Union to be "forever free."
Vicki Crawford, director of Morehouse College's Martin Luther King Jr. Collection, said the inauguration falling in a year of civil rights milestones is a prime opportunity for the nation to re-examine its past and look ahead to the future.
"Obama is a part of the continuum of a history that began before Dr. Martin Luther King," she said. "It's a long history of struggle to make America the place it should be, to make real on the promise of democracy. This is a momentous time; 2013 is a crossroads."
Harris, the Columbia University professor, said that while King's moment in 1963 and Obama's in 2013 are evidence of how far the country has come despite persistent racial polarization, he would like to see Obama start to emphasize issues that were important to King.
"I would also hope that this won't be just a day of recognition but also that it will point in some direction in the second term that the president will begin to speak much more clearly and forcefully about the persistence of racial inequality in American life," he said.
___
Associated Press writers Eric Tucker in Washington and Kate Brumback in Atlanta contributed to this report.
___
Follow Darlene Superville on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dsupervilleap
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
My own opinion of course, but I feel it disrespectful of Obama to try and "share" the Holiday with the likes of Dr. King.Â
Dr. King was inclusive while Obama is clearly devisive.
Dr. King did not believe in War while Obama is jumping in headfirst at every opportunity
Dr. King lost his life trying to get better wages for garbage workers while Obama is making Al Gore and John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi and the public employees unions powerful and rich
Adding over $7 trillion to our national debt is not keeping the economy afloat. Bush left us with $9 trillion in debt Obama promised to cut that in half by the end of his first term to $4.5 trillion we are now at $16.4 trillion and on track to top $22 trillion by 2016. He has no integrity, he's a progressive who's dividing this nation economically,socially,racially,religiously and morally. Please, MLK would not be impressed that the first so called black president is completely inept!
Society has come a long way. There are no more "garbage workers"; instead, they are "sanitation engineers", and they are paid a living wage. What does this Columbia U. professor, Harris, expect Obama to do, hand out free money to those who remain economically-challenged? The playing field has been leveled in many ways. I think Dr. King would approve. I think he would applaud a black man who kept the economy afloat, and managed to get reelected without compromising his integrity.
@felines99 king was a republican. Why would he applaud a dem getting reelected?
 @slumlord420  @felines99 King was not a Republican. A black Republican activist, Kamau-Imani, had billboards claiming that King was a Republican erected in the Dallas area prior to the election, in an effort to win votes from black Americans. The only "documentation" he has is a video clip of one of King's nieces making that claim. But even Kamau-Imani admits that there is no documentation to back up her claim. King's own son insists that he was NOT a Republican. Thomas Jackson, history professor at the University of North Carolina and author of a book on King, calls King a "'tax and spend' democratic socialist". David Garrow, author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning book on King, explains that King did not ascribe to either party, but that he "almost certainly voted for Democrats John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson." Finally, do you seriously believe that Martin Luther King, Jr. would have cast his vote for a man who said that he cannot do anything for 47% of the American population??? More than 96% of black voters cast their votes for Obama. That should also give you a clue.
Â
Of course, you already know that King was not a Republican. The fact that you would claim that he is anyway, is just more evidence of Republican "dirty tricks" on your part.
"I think he would applaud a black man who kept the economy afloat, and managed to get reelected without compromising his integrity"
-------------------
Â
Huh? What "black man" and what economy are you talking about?
Â
And why do you care so much about people's skin color (remember that "content of their character" stuff the Rev. MLK preached)?
Â
 @oregoncraig Did you even bother to READ the article, pal??? I commented on skin color because that is what the article talks about: "Frederick Harris, Director of Columbia University's Center on African-American Politics and Society, argues that Obama's reluctance to bring black issues to the forefront undermines the work of King and other civil rights leaders whose efforts made his presidency possible." Capiche???
 @oregoncraig P.S. Do you actually believe that King never spoke of "blacks" and "whites"??? From his "I Have a Dream Speech": ". . . . And when this happens . . . we will be able to speed up that day when all God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, 'Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'
AHEM. You, in your arrogance, have just been had.
 @oregoncraig Do you read much???
Â
I'm sure Professor Harris remembers the "content of their character" reference of King's -- as well as I -- but I am responding to an article which directly and unabashedly speaks to the color of one's skin. So I again must ask you, did you even READ the article???
I will waste my time asking you once more:
Â
Do you remember that "content of their character" stuff the Rev. MLK preached?
Â
And thanks for the pointlessly snotty Italian language lesson.Â
Â