Could a homeless village work in Eugene?
EUGENE, Ore. - In a movement born of Occupy Eugene, the City of Eugene has narrowed down to 5 the possible locations for a homeless camp designed to help transition people off the streets and back into mainstream society.
But even as the Opportunity Village concept moves ahead, shelters and service providers are bursting at the seams with demand for help.
"Our issue is that we have seen the most dramatic increase in population and different populations within the homeless population that I've seen in the 30 years that I've worked here," said Terry McDonald, executive director of St. Vincent de Paul. "We are seeing the least amount of money for resources available to help."
St. Vincent has programs to help the homeless, like the car camping program which arranges for people to park in designated areas around the city.
The number of people they can help is limited, McDonald said. Service providers "can offer some showers, they can offer some laundry," he said, "but there is no place to go."
Over at the Eugene Mission, it's a similar story.
"We would not only see these full but typically we would have barrels and barrels of clothing," Jack Tripp of the Eugene Mission said of their clothing supply room shelves, "but we don't right now, and the reason for it is, is that we're housing over 100 more men a night than we did a year ago."
So beyond a meal or a fresh pair of clothes once in a while, there is no place for people to live and transition back into society.
That is where the idea of a self-sustained community called Opportunity Village comes into play. The vision is to have housing, utilities and bathroom facilities in a self-governed community, not just a makeshift homeless camp.
"They have a lifespan and then they just fail," McDonald said of similar efforts elsewhere. "It's largely because it requires substantial governance in order that it stays clear of the usual predatory problems that are apparent on the street: drugs, alcohol, theft and violence."
Dan Bryant, who chairs the Opportunity Village board, thinks the idea can work with the right piece of property - and the right people living in the village.
"We have seen from our past experience that when you create that kind of community that is self-governing that people who are currently without homes take responsibility for their lives, you help people," he said.
The idea was brought to the Eugene City Council in hopes they would provide city owned property upon which to build the village.
The Council agreed to look at possible land options and have narrowed it down to five:
- 1.4 acres on Commons Drive and South Garden Way, with 433 residences within 600 feet
- 2.6 acres also near Commons Drive and South Garden Way, with 398 homes within 600 feet
- 3.7 acres south of I-105 within 600 feet of 824 homes
- 2.6 acres on N. Garfield Street and Cross Street near 62 homes
- 3.1 acres at 13th Avenue and Chambers Street near 231 homes
Neighbors in those areas have mixed feelings about a homeless village setting up shop in their backyards.
"I think that would be a great thing for the homeless people," said Tyler Herkemhoff, who lives in the Harlow neighborhood. "I mean nothing is really going on out here, this is just open land. I don't ever see anyone using it so I think that would be a good program for them to do."
"I think it wouldn't be a good place to do that because of the potential crime that it would bring," said Christina Jones, who lives in the Jefferson Westside Neighborhood.
"It's going to take time. It's a community process it takes time, takes conversation," Bryant said. "We've taken one step now to move us in the right direction."
There's already a homeless village here. It's called EUGENE.
Oh, great..now more homeless will show up in Eugene....hoards of beggars..this will not put people back to work, it will enable them to remain mooches on society. Glad I don't live in Eugene, will take my shopping dollars someplace else, someplace with a real police force and real laws that are enforced!
Our coddled and enabled homeless population in Eugene is quite a bit higher than the number of homeless people this "village" will actually help. And thanks to Occupy Eugene, the homeless problem in Eugene has actually grown larger, not improved. I don't see this idea being helpful to the homeless as a whole and I do see it being harmful to the neighborhood it would be placed in (and by this I mean ANY neighborhood, regardless of which one). No one wants something like this where they are trying to raise their family, and where they are working very hard to pay for their homes and live a good life. Having a homeless village right in your backyard is a slap in the face for hardworking tax-paying citizens, and is a security concern as well not to mention what it will do to property values. Just all around not a good idea. We don't even bike the river bike trail alone anymore because of the increase in homeless camps and creepy interactions we've had with homeless people along the trail. Before Occupy we never had any problems, but ever since it's as if the issue has ballooned. It's scary. We only go in groups now. I personally would be really pissed if somebody tried to build a homeless village in my neighborhood, and I feel really bad for the people living near the 5 options listed in the above article (and I'm really glad I don't). Better sell while you can. :( Because who will ever want to buy a home near something like this?
The only reason we have such a burgeoning homeless population is that people keep feeding the problem by giving them money and resources.  Every time some idiot rolls down their window to give one these people money, the problem just becomes that much more entrenched.Â
Sure would be nice if they would quit trying to ape everything that Portland does. Progressives are extremely conceptually challenged. What they should start doing is take a piece of paper and write down 10 good things about creating a homeless village. Then take another piece of paper, or write small, and write down all the potential ills of creating such a community. I think they might be enlightened.
@souptonuts    Don't bother them with facts.Â
We have enough homeless outreach programs. Lets try to help those who pay for the homeless for a real change. The City of Eugene needs to stop misspending funds and OVER PAYING for people who DO NOT WORK. We are losing contributing members of our communities at record rates. More punitive taxation to support dysfunction is not the answer.
The problem with this is that a large percentage of the homeless here do NOT want to be put back into mainstream society! They like to have everything given to them.
So why would I want my money put towards them! They only want society to give to them and give nothing in return to society! And yes I agree, why do these homeless people go out and get pets they can't take care of!!!
I'm sorry but there is no reason to enable the lazy people more than we already do. I think this is a bad idea no matter where you put it. There are plenty of resources out there already for the people that truly want to get off the streets so I have no sympathy for any of them. I especially hate when I see these people with animals. If you can't take care of yourself, how the h are you going to take care of someone (something) else?!?
Could a homeless village work in Eugene? As noted above, people in a community tend to take more responsibility. But it still matters if they can keep the FBI out of it. The FBI in Eugene use the exact same tactic over and over again, infiltrate and destroy or, as the FBI say, Befiend and Betray. They are already deeply rooted in Eugene's co-op housing so you know they will go camping with the homeless too, but only to make sure nothing positive can happen.
befiend is pretty good but, as I meant to write, the tactic is called Befriend and Betray, a really sad situation in most of Eugene's co-op housing.
I have no problem with the project, but I have a serious problem with using public resources for it. That's not the proper role of our government. If Occupy wants to create a homeless village they need to buy some land, not try to take it from the city.
What happens if these people decide they don't want to integrate into mainstream society?
Do you mean not integrate like the Wall St. speculators or the upper class of pseudo-rich confidence gamers (on paper) super rich????? Or Tea-Party groaners?
 @Sybil Natawa Could you BE any more ridiculous? =/ Are the super rich considered mainstream society? No? Then that's obviously not what he means. And what does this have to do with the Tea Party?
 @Sybil Natawa "Do you mean not integrate like the Wall St. speculators or the upper class of pseudo-rich confidence gamers (on paper) super rich????? Or Tea-Party groaners?"Where the blazes do you think the money for the welfare and Government programs these folks are given comes from?  First it comes from the working class in the form of taxes, which includes those you listed.  The second source is loans from the Chinese and third from donations by, once again the working class who give and donate to charities.  Are you an Artisan, musician, performer of some kind in this area?  If so who buys your art or pays to watch you perform?  Could it be those in the working class you despise??  Even the money the hippie Country Fair crowd has to come from someone who earned it somehow.  Your lack of appreciation for those who provide your living, in one form or another, whether you have a job or not, is truly astounding.Â
When did the rich NOT be considered part of society? or as you put it, ah...mainstream society. Do you mean the rich/super rich have their own seperate society? Culture? Nation? Justice? Rewards? Hmmmm, maybe they do.
 @Sybil Natawa No!  If they don't want to be self sufficient, work for what they have, provide for their daily needs, then why should should they be provided anything by the public?  If you want then provided a place to be homeless, may I suggest your back yard.  Maybe you have a room for them.  Just think of the good feeling you'll get supplying their food, shelter and in most cases alcohol and tobacco.  I worked two and three jobs so my wife be our childrens guide to life.  You'd think these "homeless" who won't take a job pulling weeds or cleaning toilets were something special.  They are for the most part lazy substance abusers who choose the lifestyle.  Your goodie two shoes bs means nothing if you are not willing to bring them into YOUR home or neighbor hood.
Geez SF, I keep talkin about the rich and you keep talkin about the poor.
Our "leaders" need to stop giving millions to other countries in foriegn aid and invest that money in our own people... Ah such is the dissconect between the 1% and the rest of the country.
 @2easy2berightback True, but to invest in those who are willing to work toward their own betterment.
Â
 @2easy2berightback Our government has no business giving millions to other countries OR redistributing wealth in our own.