Monthly city service fee could go to Eugene voters in May

EUGENE, Ore. - Voters could weigh in on a monthly city service fee on the May 2013 ballot.
But first they will have an opportunity to comment on the proposed fee at a public hearing in February.
The city manager presented a plan for a monthly fee of up to $10 at a work session of the Eugene City Council on Monday evening.
City Manager Jon Ruiz said the fee would likely be $5 to $7 per month per dwelling and business location, with a cap of $10 per month written into the law.
The Council voted 6-2 to direct city staff to draft an ordinance creating the fee and bring it to a public hearing on February 4.
Ruiz said the city had trimmed the budget $24 million over the last four years via a 4-point plan of financial stewardship, economic prosperity, investing in community goals and controlling costs.
Even with those increase efficiencies, the city is running a $6 million annual gap between revenue and expenses, Ruiz said.
And new money is not coming in: Ruiz showed how general fund revenues grew an average of 6.2 percent from 2003 to 2009. In the last 4 years, that fund has grown an average of .6 percent per year.
He noted that the city reduced library branch hours last year, and that several one-time budget items - a fire company at Station No. 2, gang prevention and homeless prevention and interventions efforts among them - would not be renewed this year without new revenue.
Ruiz said the city staff has proposed a 4-point plan to solve the problem. The first three prongs are growing the tax base; reducing the footprint of government; and moving park operation costs to the stormwater fee.
The fourth part would be to implement a new city service fee.
Ruiz went over the results of public opinion polling conducted in July and November of 2012.
"Essentially what this says is the majority of the people in the community have said they are willing to pay a modest fee to maintain the services we now enjoy," Ruiz told the council.
The July survey tested proposals for new revenues, including business licenses, a local income tax or a local restaurant tax.
"A monthly service fee was the one people said yes to primarily," Ruiz said.
In November, the poll more specifically tested the fee against an increase in property tax. Again, those polled showed a preference for the fee, with some caveats, Ruiz said.
Voters said they wanted a cap; they wanted some specificity in how the money would be spent; they wanted oversight and transparency; and they wanted the fee reviewed after 5 years.
The proposed framework approved by the council would dedicate the fee to closing that $6 million gap; funding those one-time expenditures added back into the budget last year; and restoring reductions in library services.
The money would not be used to launch new initiatives, he said, but rather to stabilize existing city services and prevent their future erosion.
Ruiz said the proposal would include measure of low-income resident assistance, similar to aid offered by the Eugene Water and Electric Board.
We are talking about saving Cahoots (which mostly responds to calls that would go to the much more expensive police and fire departments if they weren't available); Buckley House (which provides respite for people who would likely otherwise be taking up much more expensive jail and emergency room beds); as well as fire prevention & emergency medical services, and the library. Put politics aside for a moment and recognize we need these things.
I'd find a guillotine and chop my head off to avoid this head tax, but they'd just get a ghoulish smile and pry out the gold fillings from the few teeth I have left in my skull.
What about city council members lowering their pay? They are business owners so the city council is added income. Why not lower the city council pay and cut back where the hurt is not dumped on a community of people that struggle to meet their own needs? There may be even more benefits they receive that could be cut back on as well.
Lets just get to the basic nitty gritty here. Oregon has mail in ballots,Right? To mail each registered voter a ballot in Eugene will cost a lot of money ,Right?They,,( the not my mayor and her city council minions) are trying to propose a fee that all of us pay,Right? They say they don't have enough money,Right? But Yet,, they will pay all this money to send each of us a mail in ballot to vote on a fee that no one wants.Is this proper money handling by those who run the city of Eugene? Getting the picture?
so the city of eugene thinks i can afford anther $100 to $200 dollars a year in fees?. They are living in some type of dream world, GET A CLUE Eugene city council.. I cannot afford to give you any more money. wake up!,, wake up! The people of eugene cannot take anymore taxes!!!!
NAWWWW....
Â
How about a reverse fee. Â
Â
ITS CALLED A DIS-SERVICE FEE..
Â
Every time we think you did us wrong, you pay us. (out of your salary)
Â
Â
Next there will be a poll tax, wanna bet?
Homeless prevention? Eugene has already become legendary for homeless encouragement. Give them more, and they will keep asking for more.
FIRE KITTY PERCY AND PUT THE MONEY WHERE HER MOUTH WAS !!!!
all these greedy cities do is take the money that was replaced by the "new tax" money and spend it on something else, that is some additional special interest service/handout. Thus the shortfall is self-perpetuating. Never is there a policy of paying for essential services of fire, police, water, and sewer then funding other things if there is any left over. Never is there permanent across the board pay/benefit reductions.
No matter what you say..this is a fee..it is not a tax..it will be applied...no matter how much you hate it..they are the tyranical opressive Liberal progressive old hippies in control. The slippery slope has been lubed with KY and is now ready for insertion. Bend over Eugene and take it like a good public living in a bubble.
I can not wait to move from this litter dump with bad idiots running it. Â
No more, No more. Forget to put this fee on the ballot. You people that run this county and city have put yourselves in this situation. It's your bed sleep in it. Save cost of putting it on the ballot so you can pay your bills.
REALLY? are they so far up stuck up their behinds with that nose buried there,,that they actually think this would pass a vote? EWEB raising rates once again.. EMX mishandled and wasting good money by throwing it down the drain on a project WE the People don't want.. wasted tax payers dollars behind Beltline renaming..The list goes on and on and on..REALLY? This is a blatant violation of basic civil/human rights,and discriminatory to boot.Discrimination against fixed income folks..discrimination against low wage earners.. discrimination Period! Where is it these folks can afford this asinine fee?They can barely make it as is..and then we turn around and pay more through the nose to support city kitty homeless camps and such.. PLEASE!!! give us a BREAK!!!! and quit wasting tax paying money trying to rip off more money from us all
 @Whitehawk and don't forget the five figures spent on a fence to protect one city councilman from the unholy terror of nude females.
(sing to the tune of "Fire on the Mountain"...) The more that we give, the more they take, from the city and county to the fed and the state. Â
We already pay for EVERY SERVICE WE GET. This is a "just because you live here" tax/fee. Cause you're the Tax Man...yeaaaaah, the Tax Man!
This is nothing more than a tax on the air you breathe, based on your Zip Code.Â