'There are ominous signals coming from the ecosystem'

SEATTLE (AP) — Rising acidity levels in the oceans pose a serious threat to shellfish and other marine life, and tackling that problem in Washington state will require reducing carbon dioxide emissions, keeping polluted runoff out of marine waters, and increasing monitoring at hatcheries, a group of experts recommended Tuesday.
The panel of scientists and policy experts convened by Gov. Chris Gregoire recommended dozens of actions to combat changes to ocean chemistry detected several years ago when oyster larvae in Pacific Northwest hatcheries began dying in large numbers.
"There are ominous signals coming from the ecosystem on this issue, as ominous as anything coming from climate change," said Jay Manning, former state ecology director who headed the panel with former Environmental Protection Agency administrator Bill Ruckelshaus.
Gregoire, who formed the group as part of a state and federal initiative to help protect the state's $270 million shellfish industry, scheduled a news conference Tuesday to announce her new steps.
"This report really draws attention to a problem that exists internationally but that has really hit hard right here in the state of Washington," said Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Lubchenco was a professor at Oregon State University prior to be tapped by Obama to run NOAA.
The problem known as acidification is caused when oceans absorb human-generated carbon dioxide, mostly from the atmosphere and also from nutrient runoff and other sources.
Studies have shown that corrosive water has a dramatic effect on oysters, clams, and corals, and could potentially affect the broader marine food web.
Washington state is the nation's top producer of farmed shellfish. The problem affects the industry along with consumers and anyone who has ever dug up razor clams or picked oysters on the coast, Manning said.
The panel, the first of its kind for a state, recommended 42 wide-ranging actions for consideration by the governor, who leaves office in January. It cited 18 key priorities, including developing a strategy to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and finding innovative techniques such as seaweed farming to capture and remove carbon.
Some actions would take several years, while others might take much longer. Manning said the group didn't tally a total cost because many of the actions can be scaled, while others might not even be implemented depending on what further research shows.
Ocean acidification likely affects marine organisms to varying degrees, but research has shown those using the mineral calcium carbonate to make shells, skeletons or other body parts are more sensitive to changing sea chemistry. The organisms include oysters, clams, scallops, mussels and coral.
In February, scientists in Oregon found evidence that higher levels of carbon dioxide in the Pacific Ocean were responsible for the failure of oyster larvae to survive in 2005 at Whiskey Creek Shellfish Hatchery on Netarts Bay.
The panel said Washington's waters are particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification because seasonal ocean upwelling brings water rich in carbon dioxide — and more acidic — up from the deep ocean toward the continental shelf.
"We're still struggling with what we know and what we don't know about the biological impacts. We do know a whole lot about what happens to oyster larvae," said Richard Feely, an oceanographer at NOAA's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle and a panel member.
Scientists are learning that other organisms such as pteropods — tiny free-swimming snails that are a primary food source for salmon — are already being affected by acidification, Feely said.
More recent work has found that acidifying oceans can affect behavioral responses of some organisms, such as whether a fish will go toward or avoid a predator, he said.
"We now need to have a better understanding of how the changes are taking place at the very bases of the food chain and how those changes permeate through the food chain up to fish and birds and mammals," Feely said.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press
Hmmm, so some oyster larvae didn't do to well in a hatchery during 2005, and now we're supposed to impose all these wide ranging actions that will cripple the economy and give more power to the government? Yeah, that sounds about right. Â It might be worth considering that hatcheries are run by humans and likely do not reflect what is going on in actual nature.Â
These scientists receive their funding from the Federal Government. To receive that funding they often work to find results the powers that be in DC (95% liberal) desire. I work with biologists and they openly admit this.Â
This isn't an agenda, this isn't propaganda. It is scientific fact, with reliable verified proof. It isn't about taxes, or freedom, it is about the survival of our planet, if not for us then for our children. Our atmosphere is at it's highest levels of carbon dioxide that it has been in millions if not billions of years. Ice core samples prove this. Yes, part of it is a natural cycle our Earth goes through every 100,000 years or so, but the massive changes we have seen in the last 100 years is unprecedented. We ARE contributing this in a major way. Pre-Industrial Revolution levels were at ~ 300 ppmv, while today we are at ~395 ppmv. That is a 40% increase in 100 years, something that would normally take 40,000 years. It is estimated that by the year 2100, if levels continue to increase at the current rate, we will reach 1000 ppmv. The increase in ocean levels and acidity due to polar melting would most likely shut down the Thermohaline circulation at that point. Yes, this would be a very bad thing.I'm not even going to start on what methane does to the atmosphere, or how all this effects local and global economy.
It is simple. Do your own research, but do it with an open mind, the information both pro and con is out there, free for everyone to read.
Carbon dioxide emissions from man are nothing compared to underwater volcanoes going off. We have almost no affect on our atmosphere. The earth is doing it to herself. Lets tax her for it.
More BS global warming,carbon taxes, agenda 21 propoganda....
Agenda driven. If you want to write about this stuff, why don't you always get two opinions. Are you afraid science on one side would be stronger and more convincing that science on the other side. Agenda driven.
 @souptonuts Scientific fact doesn't have an agenda. I apologize if reality has a liberal bias, but it's true.
 @souptonuts who agenda? More coal fired electric plants in China? There wind blows our way.  If it is anyones agenda it is big money oil, gas, guns, drugs that consistently play viva Las Vegas and want less restrictions.  To ignore the health of fisheries and the ocean is this a good thing?  Miles of garbage with dead zones is this a liberal or conservative word game?  Mile long drift nets being used still?  What agenda? An agenda for survival is what I see.  The label crap has got to end or we are doomed as human beings.
@drinkmorewater It all comes down to education. If our education systems was working instead of being agenda driven we would not be suffering from some of the ills we see today. Responsibility, honor, and truth have been discarded and replaced with greed, self centeredness, and total lack of respect for others. You get decent schools and decent teachers who are not pushing agendas, but teaching good, truth, honor, facts, and good history the rest will fall in line. We both know that is not likely to happen, so you tell me your best answer to the problem other than putting people in chains?
@RelaxThereIsNoGod By virtue of your handle, I would assume that you believe there is no God. Could you provide me with scientific evidence of that. I would like to see any evidence you might have to support your position, if that is your position. Thank you for your time.
@RelaxThereIsNoGod Would you tell me how Rush Limbaugh or Fox news got into any of this? I know that progressive liberals hate both, but what has that got to do with truth, honor and facts as well as good history. I could write you a book on misrepresentations, untruths, science that disputes all of the liberal agenda. I am a liberal in some ways, and a conservative in other ways. I am not willing to take advantage of my fellow man for my own personal gain. If you would come out from under the hood that has blinded you, you might be able to see someone else's point of view. Try to be understanding and be tolerant of others, you might like the feeling. I merely state my opinion if anyone wants to agree or believe it that is their business. Have a good day, and try not to call names, it just hurts some peoples feelings.
@drinkmorewater @souptonuts The ultimate agenda is to TAX you more...duh , and limit more of your freedom.
 @souptonuts  @drinkmorewater when you say agenda what agenda? Is a dead ocean good for so called conservatives and bad for liberals? Should all our forest land be in the hands of private timber companies?  Who's interest is it to hold back appropriate technology?  We are all in this game. Business has taken over government.  Reading the Capital Press out of Salem gives me some glimmer of hope because while supported by some big industry advertisers in prints opposing view points most of the time. I quit watching Fox news years ago and my life is better.
You are scientifically illiterate and it shows. Turn off Rush Limbaugh.